 |
브레이크뉴스 정민우 기자= 한전KDN이 공기업 경영평가에서 최우수 기관으로 선정됐다. 한전KDN은 재무부문에서 1위, 비재무부문에서 5위를 기록하며 종합 1위에 올랐다.
반면, 한국광해광업공단은 최하위 공기업이라는 불명예를 안았다. 한국광해광업공단은 비재무부문에서는 1위를 기록했으나, 재무부문에서는 꼴찌인 31위를 기록했다.
11일 CEO스코어에 따르면 시장형 공기업 14곳, 준시장형 공기업 17곳 등 총 31개사를 대상으로 2023~2024년 결산 기준 경영 데이터 등을 분석한 결과, 한전KDN이 ‘2025년 공기업 경영 평가’에서 총점 672.7점을 획득하며 종합 1위를 차지했다.
이번 평가는 ‘2025년 공공기관 경영평가편람’ 및 ‘공공기관 경영정보공개시스템’의 공시 항목을 기반으로, 재무 부문(500점)과 비재무 부문(500점)으로 나눠 진행됐다.
재무부문에서 안정성(120점), 수익성(110점), 활동성(120점), 효율성(150점) 등을 배점했고, 비재무부문에선 인력(140점), 보수·복리후생(140점), 환경(120점), 안전(100점) 등을 평가했다. 각 항목별 순위에 따라 점수를 부여, 합산해 총점 1000점 만점으로 계산했다.
경영 평가 최우수 공기업에 오른 한전KDN은 재무부문 369.35점으로 1위, 비재무부문은 303.35점 5위를 기록했다. 세부항목을 살펴보면 △안정성(103.2점, 4위) △활동성(90.5점, 4위) △인력(90.7점, 5위) 등에서 상위권 점수를 획득했다.
총점 633.4점으로 경영평가 상위 2위에 오른 한국동서발전은 수익성 부문과 효율성 항목에서 좋은 평가를 받았다. 지난해 경영평가 1위였던 한전KPS는 올해도 622.9점으로 3위에 이름을 올렸다. 한전KPS는 환경(90.6점, 3위)과 안전(69.0 5위) 등 2개 항목에서 높은 점수를 따냈다.
반면, 한국광해광업공단은 재무부문 부진으로 총점 420.9점으로 최하위 기업에 선정됐다. 한국광해광업공단은 비재무부문이 315.5점으로 1위를 기록했으나, 재무부문이 105.4점으로 31위에 그쳤다. 세부적으로 △안정성(17.1점, 31위) △수익성(15.8점, 31위) △효율성(17.7점, 31위) 등 전반적으로 부진했다.
이어 한국철도공사가 429.0점으로 하위 2위에 선정됐고, 한국방송광고진흥공사는 432.3점으로 하위 3위에 랭크됐다.
지난해 경영평가 상위 3위에 이름을 올렸던 제주국제자유도시개발센터의 경우, 올해 총점 494.7점으로 24계단 하락하며 하위 5위에 그쳤다. 제주국제자유도시개발센터는 △안전(32.5점, 31위) △활동성(44.7점, 30위), △인력(58.6점, 28위) 등 전반적으로 저조한 성적을 거뒀다.
재무부문에서 안정성은 제주국제자유도시개발센터가 113.1점으로 1위를 달성했다. 제주국제자유도시개발센터는 부채/자산비율 12.0%, 유동비율 920.7%, 부채비율 13.6%를 기록했다.
이어 해양환경공단이 104.1점으로 안정성 2위에 올랐다. 해양환경공단은 이자비용이 없고 유동비율은 275.8%로 나타났다.
수익성은 인천국제공항공사가 97.6점으로 1위를 차지했다. 인천국제공항공사는 매출 증가율 19.4%, 영업이익률 28.7%, EBITDA/매출액 49.5%를 기록했다.
활동성 1위는 99.5점을 받은 한국가스기술공사였다. 한국가스기술공사는 총자산회전율 171.1%, 자기자본회전율 288.8%로 나타났다.
한국서부발전은 128.4점으로 효율성 1위를 기록했다. △노동생산성(46.4점, 2위) △인건비생산성(45.5점, 2위) △자본생산성(36.5점, 6위) 등 전반적으로 상위권 점수를 획득했다.
인력부문은 한국가스공사가 110.8점으로 1위를 차지했다. 한국가스공사는 남성 이직자비율 2.5%, 신규채용 157명, 여성 이직자비율 1.1%를 기록했다.
이 외에도 한국마사회가 100.0점으로 보수·복리후생부문 1위, 한국부동산원이 93.3점으로 환경부문 1위, 강원랜드가 77.2점으로 안전부문 1위를 달성했다.
break9874@naver.com
*아래는 위 기사를 '구글 번역'으로 번역한 영문 기사의 [전문]입니다. 구글번역'은 이해도 높이기를 위해 노력하고 있습니다. 영문 번역에 오류가 있을 수 있음을 전제로 합니다.<*The following is [the full text] of the English article translated by 'Google Translate'. 'Google Translate' is working hard to improve understanding. It is assumed that there may be errors in the English translation.>
Public Enterprise Management Evaluation 1st Place ‘Korea Electric Power Corporation KDN’, Disgraceful Last Place ‘Gwanghae Mining Corporation’
KEPCO KDN was selected as the best organization in the public enterprise management evaluation. KEPCO KDN ranked first in the financial sector and fifth in the non-financial sector, ranking first overall.
On the other hand, Korea Mining and Refining Corporation received the dishonor of being the lowest-ranking public enterprise. Korea Mining and Refining Corporation ranked first in the non-financial sector, but last in the financial sector, ranking 31st.
According to CEO Score on the 11th, after analyzing management data for 31 companies, including 14 market-type public enterprises and 17 quasi-market-type public enterprises, based on the 2023-2024 financial statements, KEPCO KDN earned a total score of 672.7 points in the ‘2025 Public Enterprise Management Evaluation’ and ranked first overall.
This evaluation was conducted based on the disclosure items of the ‘2025 Public Institution Management Evaluation Manual’ and the ‘Public Institution Management Information Disclosure System’, and was divided into the financial sector (500 points) and the non-financial sector (500 points).
In the financial sector, stability (120 points), profitability (110 points), activity (120 points), and efficiency (150 points) were given points, and in the non-financial sector, human resources (140 points), compensation and welfare (140 points), environment (120 points), and safety (100 points) were evaluated. Points were awarded according to the ranking of each item, and the total score was calculated with a full score of 1000 points.
KEPCO KDN, which was selected as the best public enterprise in the management evaluation, ranked first in the financial sector with 369.35 points, and fifth in the non-financial sector with 303.35 points. Looking at the details, it received high scores in △Stability (103.2 points, 4th place) △Activity (90.5 points, 4th place) △Human Resources (90.7 points, 5th place).
Korea East-West Power, which ranked 2nd in the management evaluation with a total score of 633.4 points, received good evaluations in the profitability and efficiency categories. KEPCO KPS, which ranked 1st in the management evaluation last year, ranked 3rd again this year with 622.9 points. KEPCO KPS received high scores in two categories: Environment (90.6 points, 3rd place) and Safety (69.0, 5th place).
On the other hand, Korea Mining and Energy Corporation was selected as the lowest-ranking company with a total score of 420.9 points due to poor financial performance. Korea Mining and Energy Corporation ranked 1st in the non-financial sector with 315.5 points, but ranked 31st in the financial sector with 105.4 points. Specifically, it was weak overall in terms of ▲Stability (17.1 points, 31st place), ▲Profitability (15.8 points, 31st place), and ▲Efficiency (17.7 points, 31st place).
Korea Railroad Corporation was ranked in the bottom 2nd place with 429.0 points, and Korea Broadcasting Advertising Promotion Corporation was ranked in the bottom 3rd place with 432.3 points.
Jeju International Free City Development Center, which ranked in the top 3 in management evaluation last year, fell 24 places to the bottom 5th place with a total score of 494.7 points this year. Jeju International Free City Development Center had poor overall performances in ▲Safety (32.5 points, 31st place), ▲Activity (44.7 points, 30th place), and ▲Human Resources (58.6 points, 28th place).
In the financial sector, Jeju International Free City Development Center achieved first place in stability with 113.1 points. Jeju International Free City Development Center recorded a debt/asset ratio of 12.0%, a current ratio of 920.7%, and a debt ratio of 13.6%.
The Korea Marine Environment Corporation ranked second in stability with 104.1 points. The Korea Marine Environment Corporation had no interest expenses and a current ratio of 275.8%.
Incheon International Airport Corporation ranked first in profitability with 97.6 points. Incheon International Airport Corporation recorded a sales growth rate of 19.4%, an operating profit rate of 28.7%, and an EBITDA/sales ratio of 49.5%.
Korea Gas Technology Corporation ranked first in activity with 99.5 points. Korea Gas Technology Corporation recorded a total asset turnover rate of 171.1% and an equity turnover rate of 288.8%.
Korea Western Power ranked first in efficiency with 128.4 points. △Labor productivity (46.4 points, 2nd place) △Personnel cost productivity (45.5 points, 2nd place) △Capital productivity (36.5 points, 6th place) etc. It received top scores across the board.
In the human resources sector, Korea Gas Corporation ranked first with 110.8 points. Korea Gas Corporation recorded a male turnover rate of 2.5%, 157 new hires, and a female turnover rate of 1.1%.
In addition, Korea Racing Authority ranked first in the compensation and welfare sector with 100.0 points, Korea Real Estate Board ranked first in the environment sector with 93.3 points, and Kangwon Land ranked first in the safety sector with 77.2 points.
