 ▲ 정경심 동양대 교수 ©정경심 |
민생당 박정희 대변인은 24일 발표한 “정경심 피고인, 1심 법정구속 판결 반성하지 않는 태도, 증거인멸 우려 때문” 제목의 논평에서 “조국 전 법무부장관의 부인 정경심 교수가 4년 징역형에 법정구속 됐다. 1심 판결은 합당한 판단이다. 사실인정 등 자백을 하지 않은 피고인에 대한 법정구속은 ‘증거인멸의 우려’가 명백할 때 내려진다. 피고인 측은 1심 판결에 대한 불복으로 즉각 항소하겠다고 하지만, 검찰 역시 무죄부분에 대해 즉시 항소할 것”이라고 설명하고 “오히려 여러 범죄 혐의에 비해 형량이 가볍다고 볼 것이다. 1심 법정구속의 함의는, 항소심에서도 집행유예 등 실형을 벗어날 개연성이 없다는 점도 고려한 것이다. "가혹한 판결이다"라는 등 판결을 부정하는 듯한 여권 정치인들의 인식은 반(反) 법치주의적 태도다. 삼가야 한다. 사필귀정이다. 진지한 반성이 먼저다”고 덧붙였다.
*아래는 위 기사를 구글 번역기로 번역한 영문 기사의 [전문]이다. [Below is the [full text] of an English article translated from the above article with Google Translate.]
The Minsaeng Party “Defendant of the court of the courts, the attitude of not reflecting on the court ruling in the first instance, because of concerns about destruction of evidence”
Park Jung-hee, spokesman for the Minsaeng Party, "Rather, the sentence is lighter compared to various crime charges."
-Reporter Park Jeong-dae
Minsaeng Party spokesman Park Jeong-hee said in a commentary titled “The defendant Jung Kyung-shim, not reflecting on the court ruling in the first instance, because of fears of destruction of evidence”, “Professor Jeong Gyeong-shim, the wife of the former Minister of Justice Cho Kook, was sentenced to four years in prison. done. The judgment of the first instance is a reasonable judgment. Court arrests against the accused who did not confess, such as acknowledging facts, come down when there is a clear concern about destruction of evidence. The defendant said that he would immediately appeal for objection to the judgment of the first trial, but the prosecution would also appeal immediately for the innocence,” he explained. “Rather, the sentence would be lighter compared to various crime charges. The implications of court arrest in the first instance were also taken into account that there is no possibility to escape imprisonment, such as probation, even in an appeal trial. The perception of passport politicians, who seem to deny the ruling, such as "it is a harsh judgment," is an anti-lawism attitude. You should refrain from doing it. It is a private return. Serious reflection comes first.”
