 |
브레이크뉴스 문홍철 기자= 금리 인상기 ‘자금 경색’이 심각한 가운데, 올 3분기 30대그룹의 계열사 간 채무금액잔액(채무보증)이 지난해 말 대비 15조원 넘게 증가한 것으로 나타났다.
채무보증 총액은 SK그룹이, 자본 대비 채무보증 비중은 효성그룹이 톱이었다.
21일 CEO스코어에 따르면 공정거래위원회 지정 국내 대기업집단 상위 30대 그룹 중 계열사 간 채무보증 현황을 공시한 207개 기업을 대상으로 조사한 결과, 올 9월말 이들 기업의 계열사 간 채무보증은 87조7161억원에 달하는 것으로 집계됐다.
이는 지난해 말 72조6476억원 대비 15조685억원(20.7%) 증가한 수준이다. 2020년말(57조5892억원)에 비하면 30조1269억원(52.3%) 늘었다. 매년 15조원 이상 증가한 셈이다.
30대그룹 중 채무보증이 가장 많은 곳은 SK로 10조7713억원이었다. 이어 삼성이 9조232억원, 농협 8조8936억원, 포스코 7조7565억원, LG 7조5403억원, 현대자동차 6조9796억원 순이었다.
자본 대비 채무보증 비중은 효성이 압도적으로 높았다. 효성의 채무보증은 5조861억원으로, 자본 6조3305억원 대비 80.3%에 달했다. 자본 대비 채무보증이 30%를 넘는 그룹은 CJ(35.4%), 농협(32.7%), 카카오(30.6%) 등이었다.
지난해 말 대비 채무보증이 가장 많이 증가한 곳도 SK로, 6조1044억원에서 10조7713억원으로 4조6669억원(76.5%) 늘었다. SK는 지난해 계열사인 SK이노베이션의 배터리 사업부가 SK온으로 분리되면서 관련 투자를 확대함에 따라 채무보증 규모가 늘어난 것으로 풀이된다.
같은 기간 삼성 2조259억원(29%), 농협 1조9153억원(27.4%), 한화 1조2436억원(25.6%), 효성 1조1221억원(28.3%)씩 각각 증가한 것으로 집계됐다.
반면, 채무보증이 가장 많이 감소한 그룹은 두산으로 7242억원(27.6%) 줄었다. 네이버는 2577억원(21.1%), 현대중공업은 1986억원(20.4%)씩 각각 감소했다.
조사대상 그룹 계열 개별기업 중 3분기 말 기준 채무보증이 가장 많은 곳은 농협은행으로 8조8838억원에 달했다.
이어 포스코홀딩스 6조6627억원, SK온 4조8568억원, CJ제일제당 4조5080억원, LG에너지솔루션 3조8602억원, 삼성SDI 3조5323억원, 삼성엔지니어링 3조3380억원, 호텔롯데 2조4252억원, 미래에셋증권 2조3202억원으로 각각 집계됐다.
개별 기업 중 채무보증이 자본 규모를 넘긴 기업은 총 10곳이었다. 이 중 효성화학이 자본 5535억원 대비 채무보증 1조7241억원으로 311.5%에 달해 초과 폭이 가장 컸다. 특히, 효성 계열사는 효성화학을 비롯해 효성첨단소재(140.6%), 효성티앤씨(111.6%), 효성티앤에스(108.1%) 등의 채무보증이 자본보다 많았다.
계속해서 채무보증이 자본 규모를 넘긴 기업으로는 삼성엔지니어링 190.5%(3조3380억원), 한화에너지 165.3%(1조9388억원), SK온 133.6%(4조8568억원), GS글로벌 131.4%(4259억원), 팜스코 125.3%(2698억원), 서린상사 108.7%(2242억원) 등이었다.
지난해 말 대비 채무보증이 가장 많이 증가한 기업은 SK온으로 2조8808억원에서 4조8568억원으로 1조9760억원(68.6%)이 증가했다. SK온은 지난해 출범 후 미국과 헝가리 법인에 대거 투자를 늘리며 채무보증이 증가한 것으로 보인다.
이어 농협은행 1조9210억원(27.6%), SK에코플랜트 1조2730억원(992.2%), CJ제일제당 1조577억원(30.7%)씩 각각 증가했다.
반대로, 지난해 말 대비 채무보증이 가장 많이 감소한 기업은 기아로, 1조6682억원에서 1조551억원으로 6131억원(36.8%) 줄었다. 또한, CJ ENM 5830억원(50.9%), 두산에너빌리티 5496억원(79.5%), 두산밥캣 2956억원(17.4%), 네이버 2577억원(21.1%), 한화호텔앤드리조트 1090억원(99.9%)씩 각각 감소했다.
break9874@naver.com
*아래는 위 기사를 '구글 번역'으로 번역한 영문 기사의 [전문]입니다. '구글번역'은 이해도 높이기를 위해 노력하고 있습니다. 영문 번역에 오류가 있을 수 있음을 전제로 합니다.<*The following is [the full text] of the English article translated by 'Google Translate'. 'Google Translate' is working hard to improve understanding. It is assumed that there may be errors in the English translation.>
‘Fund crunch’ 30 major groups, debt guarantee between affiliates 15 trillion won higher than the end of last year
An increase of 30.1 trillion won from the end of 2020.. The share of ‘SK’, which ranks first in total debt guarantee, is ‘Hyosung’
Break News Reporter Moon Hong-cheol= Amid a serious “fund crunch” during the period of interest rate hikes, it was found that the balance of debts (debt guarantees) between affiliates of the 30 major groups in the third quarter of this year increased by more than 15 trillion won compared to the end of last year.
The total amount of debt guarantees was topped by SK Group, and the ratio of debt guarantees to capital was topped by Hyosung Group.
According to the CEO Score on the 21st, a survey of 207 companies among the top 30 domestic conglomerates designated by the Fair Trade Commission that have disclosed the current status of debt guarantees between affiliates showed that the debt guarantees between affiliates of these companies amounted to 87,716.1 billion won at the end of September this year. was calculated to reach
This is an increase of 15.685 trillion won (20.7%) from 72.6476 trillion won at the end of last year. Compared to the end of 2020 (57.5892 trillion won), it increased by 30.1269 trillion won (52.3%). This is an increase of more than 15 trillion won every year.
Among the 30 largest conglomerates, SK had the most debt guarantees at 10.7713 trillion won. It was followed by Samsung with 9.232 trillion won, Nonghyup with 8.8936 trillion won, POSCO with 7.7565 trillion won, LG with 7.5403 trillion won, and Hyundai Motor with 6.9796 trillion won.
Hyosung's ratio of debt guarantees to capital was overwhelmingly high. Hyosung's debt guarantee amounted to 5.861 trillion won, reaching 80.3% of its equity capital of 6.3305 trillion won. Groups with debt guarantees to capital exceeding 30% were CJ (35.4%), Nonghyup (32.7%), and Kakao (30.6%).
The place where debt guarantees increased the most compared to the end of last year was also SK, which increased by 4,666.9 billion won (76.5%) from 6,104.4 billion won to 10,771.3 billion won. It is interpreted that the size of debt guarantees increased as SK expanded related investments after the battery division of its affiliate, SK Innovation, was separated into SK On last year.
During the same period, Samsung increased by 2.259 trillion won (29%), Nonghyup by 1.9153 trillion won (27.4%), Hanhwa by 1.2436 trillion won (25.6%), and Hyosung by 1.1221 trillion won (28.3%).
On the other hand, the group with the largest decrease in debt guarantees was Doosan, which decreased by 724.2 billion won (27.6%). Naver decreased by 257.7 billion won (21.1%) and Hyundai Heavy Industries by 198.6 billion won (20.4%).
As of the end of the third quarter, Nonghyup Bank had the largest amount of debt guarantee among group affiliates under investigation, reaching 8.8838 trillion won.
Posco Holdings 6,662.7 billion won, SK On 4,856.8 billion, CJ CheilJedang 4,508 billion won, LG Energy Solutions 3,860.2 billion won, Samsung SDI 3,532.3 billion won, Samsung Engineering 3,338 billion won, Hotel Lotte 2 trillion 425.2 billion won and Mirae Asset Securities 2.3202 trillion won respectively.
Among individual companies, a total of 10 companies had debt guarantees exceeding the size of their capital. Among them, Hyosung Chemical had the largest excess, reaching 311.5%, with debt guarantees of 1,724.1 billion won against capital of 553.5 billion won. In particular, Hyosung affiliates, including Hyosung Chemical, Hyosung Advanced Materials (140.6%), Hyosung TNC (111.6%), and Hyosung TNS (108.1%) had more debt guarantees than equity.
Companies whose debt guarantees continued to exceed the size of their capital include Samsung Engineering 190.5% (KRW 3.338 trillion), Hanwha Energy 165.3% (KRW 1.9388 trillion), SK On 133.6% (KRW 4.8568 trillion), GS Global 131.4% ( 425.9 billion won), Farmsco 125.3% (269.8 billion won), and Seorin Trading Company 108.7% (224.2 billion won).
The company whose debt guarantees increased the most compared to the end of last year was SK On, which increased by 1.976 trillion won (68.6%) from 2.8808 trillion won to 4.8568 trillion won. Since SK On was launched last year, it seems that debt guarantees have increased by massively increasing investment in US and Hungarian subsidiaries.
It was followed by Nonghyup Bank with 1.921 trillion won (27.6%), SK Eco Plant with 1.273 trillion won (992.2%), and CJ CheilJedang with 1.577 trillion won (30.7%) each.
Conversely, the company with the largest decrease in debt guarantees compared to the end of last year was Kia, which decreased by 613.1 billion won (36.8%) from 1.6682 trillion won to 1.0551 trillion won. In addition, CJ ENM KRW 583 billion (50.9%), Doosan Enervity KRW 549.6 billion (79.5%), Doosan Bobcat KRW 295.6 billion (17.4%), Naver KRW 257.7 billion (21.1%), and Hanwha Hotels & Resorts KRW 109 billion (99.9%). Decreased.
