 |
브레이크뉴스 문홍철 기자= 많은 기업들이 휴가 활성화와 유연근로시간제 등 근로시간 선택권을 확대하는 조치가 업무 생산성과 워라밸 향상에 도움이 되며, 불필요한 근로시간의 감축효과가 있다고 인식하는 것으로 나타났다.
5일 전국경제인연합회에 따르면 여론조사기관 리서치앤리서치에 의뢰해 매출액 1000대 기업 인사·노무 담당자를 대상으로 ‘근로시간제도 운영현황 조사’를 실시한 결과, 응답 기업 10곳 중 7곳(67.0%)은 생산성 및 일·생활 균형 향상을 위한 제도 도입의 필요성에 공감했다.
응답별로는 △매우 공감 21.4% △대체로 공감 45.6% △보통 24.3% △대체로 비공감 6.8% △전혀 비공감 1.9% 순이었다.
기업들이 생산성 및 일·생활 균형 향상을 위해 도입했거나, 도입을 고려하고 있는 제도로는 ‘휴가형태 다양화, 연차사용 촉진 등 휴가 활성화 조치(27.6%)’를 가장 많이 꼽았다.
이어 △탄력·선택·재량근로, 시차출퇴근 등 유연근로시간제(27.0%) △근로시간 기록·관리 시스템 구축 및 강화(21.4%) △자율좌석제, 원격근무제 등 근로장소 유연화(14.3%) △근로시간저축계좌제 (4.6%) 순이었다. ‘없음’이라고 응답한 비중은 5.1%에 그쳤다.
기업들이 업무효율 및 생산성 개선에 효과가 있다고 가장 많이 꼽은 제도는 ‘휴가형태 다양화, 연차사용 촉진 등 휴가 활성화 조치(83.5%)’로 나타났다.
다음으로 △탄력·선택·재량근로제 등 유연근로시간제(82.5%) △근로시간 기록·관리 시스템 구축 및 강화(76.7%) △자율좌석제, 원격근무 등 근로장소 유연화(68.0%), △근로시간저축계좌제(63.1%) 순이었다.
기업들이 불필요한 초과근로 감축에 효과가 있다고 가장 많이 응답한 제도는 ‘탄력·선택·재량근로제 등 유연근로시간제(73.8%)’였다.
이어 △휴가형태 다양화, 연차사용촉진 등 휴가 활성화 조치(70.9%) △근로시간 기록·관리 시스템 구축 및 강화(67.9%) △자율좌석제, 원격근무 등 근로장소 유연화(62.1%) △근로시간저축계좌제(54.4%) 순이었다.
한편, 지난 1년간 전일제 근로자의 기본근로시간과 초과근로시간을 합한 총근로시간을 조사한 결과, 1주 평균 45.7시간인 것으로 나타났다.
구체적으로 보면, △주44시간 이상 주48시간 미만(39.8%) △주48시간 이상 주52시간 미만(34.0%) △주40시간 이상 주44시간 미만(20.4%) △주36시간 이상 주40시간 미만(4.8%) △주52시간 이상 주56시간 미만(1.0%) 등이었다.
break9874@naver.com
*아래는 위 기사를 '구글 번역'으로 번역한 영문 기사의 [전문]입니다. '구글번역'은 이해도 높이기를 위해 노력하고 있습니다. 영문 번역에 오류가 있을 수 있음을 전제로 합니다.<*The following is [the full text] of the English article translated by 'Google Translate'. 'Google Translate' is working hard to improve understanding. It is assumed that there may be errors in the English translation.>
companies, ‘increase’ productivity and work-life balance, ‘reduce’ unnecessary work
Consensus on the need for a system for productivity and work-life balance...measures to promote vacation are most needed
Break News Reporter Moon Hong-cheol= It was found that many companies recognized that measures to expand working time options, such as vacation promotion and flexible working hour system, would help improve work productivity and work-life balance, as well as reduce unnecessary working hours.
According to the Federation of Korean Industries (FKI) on the 5th, it commissioned Research & Research, a polling agency, to conduct a 'survey on the operation of the working hour system' targeting personnel and labor managers at top 1000 companies in sales. As a result, 7 out of 10 companies (67.0%) responded. agreed on the necessity of introducing a system to improve productivity and work-life balance.
By response, △strongly agree 21.4% △generally agree 45.6% △moderately 24.3% △generally disagree 6.8% △do not agree 1.9%.
As for the systems that companies have introduced or are considering introducing to improve productivity and work-life balance, “measures to promote vacations, such as diversification of vacation types and promotion of annual leave,” were the most cited (27.6%).
△Flexible working hour system such as flexible, optional, and discretionary work, staggered commuting (27.0%) △Establishment and strengthening of working hour record/management system (21.4%) △Flexibility of working places such as autonomous seating system and remote work system (14.3%) △Work hours Time savings account system (4.6%) followed. Only 5.1% answered “no”.
The system most cited by companies as being effective in improving work efficiency and productivity was “vacation vitalization measures such as diversification of vacation types and promotion of annual leave use (83.5%).”
Next, △Flexible working hour system such as flexible, optional, and discretionary work system (82.5%) △Establishment and reinforcement of working hour record/management system (76.7%) △Flexible work place such as autonomous seat system and remote work (68.0%) △Working hour The savings account system (63.1%) followed.
The system that most companies responded saying was effective in reducing unnecessary overtime work was the “flexible working hour system (73.8%), such as the flexible, optional, and discretionary work system.”
This was followed by △Diversification of vacation types and promotion of annual leave use, etc. (70.9%) △Establishment and strengthening of a system for recording and managing working hours (67.9%) △Flexibility of working places, such as autonomous seat system and remote work (62.1%) △Working hours The savings account system (54.4%) followed.
On the other hand, as a result of investigating the total working hours, which are the sum of basic working hours and overtime working hours of full-time workers over the past year, it was found to be an average of 45.7 hours per week.
Specifically, △44 hours a week or more and less than 48 hours a week (39.8%) △48 hours a week or more and less than 52 hours a week (34.0%) △40 hours a week or more and less than 44 hours a week (20.4%) △36 hours a week or more, 40 hours a week hours (4.8%) △52 hours a week or more and less than 56 hours a week (1.0%).
